Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of EssaysCambridge University Press, 6 באוק׳ 2015 In this classic collection of wide-ranging and interdisciplinary essays, Stanley Cavell explores a remarkably broad range of philosophical issues from politics and ethics to the arts and philosophy. The essays explore issues as diverse as the opposing approaches of 'analytic' and 'Continental' philosophy, modernism, Wittgenstein, abstract expressionism and Schoenberg, Shakespeare on human needs, the difficulties of authorship, Kierkegaard and post-Enlightenment religion. Presented in a fresh twenty-first century series livery, and including a specially commissioned preface, written by Stephen Mulhall, illuminating its continuing importance and relevance to philosophical enquiry, this influential work is now available for a new generation of readers. |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-5 מתוך 50
עמוד
... responses of my students are often guiding in the way I have written, in everything from the specific choice of an example or allusion to a general tendency to swing between dialogue and harangue. Here I single out Allen Graubard and ...
... responses of my students are often guiding in the way I have written, in everything from the specific choice of an example or allusion to a general tendency to swing between dialogue and harangue. Here I single out Allen Graubard and ...
עמוד
... responses to their original appearance in philosophy journals, and, I believe, subsided after their collection into the book. The context of their companion essays in Must We Mean What We Say? would have, perhaps, made it plainer to ...
... responses to their original appearance in philosophy journals, and, I believe, subsided after their collection into the book. The context of their companion essays in Must We Mean What We Say? would have, perhaps, made it plainer to ...
עמוד
... response to a paper to be presented by my senior colleague Benson Mates. I had, as a result of Austin's visiting Harvard my last semester there, thrown away what may have been a partially written Ph.D. dissertation, and consequently ...
... response to a paper to be presented by my senior colleague Benson Mates. I had, as a result of Austin's visiting Harvard my last semester there, thrown away what may have been a partially written Ph.D. dissertation, and consequently ...
עמוד
... response to encountering in Pole's book a dismissive treatment of work that had changed my sense of philosophy's possibilities (and rather encouraged my sense of intellectual isolation), a dismay exacerbated by the book's uniformly ...
... response to encountering in Pole's book a dismissive treatment of work that had changed my sense of philosophy's possibilities (and rather encouraged my sense of intellectual isolation), a dismay exacerbated by the book's uniformly ...
עמוד
... response to that cry: “If philosophy is esoteric, that is not because a few men guard its knowledge but because most men guard themselves against it” (Must We Mean ... ?, p. xxvii). It is at the same time a good instance of my manner of ...
... response to that cry: “If philosophy is esoteric, that is not because a few men guard its knowledge but because most men guard themselves against it” (Must We Mean ... ?, p. xxvii). It is at the same time a good instance of my manner of ...
תוכן
The availability of Wittgensteins later philosophy | |
Aesthetic problems of modern philosophy | |
Austin at criticism | |
A reading of Becketts | |
Kierkegaards On Authority and Revelation | |
Music discomposed | |
A matter of meaning | |
Knowing and acknowledging | |
A reading of King Lear | |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2015 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
accept acknowledgment action aesthetic analytical philosophy answer Antony Flew appeal artist audience Austin's Beckett become believe book on Adler characters claim Clov concept context Cordelia course criticism deny Edgar Endgame epistemology essay example experience explanation expression fact father feel Gloucester Gloucester’s God’s Hamm Hamm’s happening human idea imagine intention Investigations irrelevant J. O. Urmson justified Kant Kierkegaard King Lear knowledge language game Lear’s logical matter mean meant merely mind modern moral motive nature Nietzsche object obvious one’s ordinary language ordinary language philosophy ourselves pain paraphrase particular perhaps person philosophical Philosophical Investigations play poem Pop Art present problem question reason relation relevant response revealed rules scene seems sense Shakespeare simply skeptic someone speak specific statements suggest suppose tell theater thing thought tradition tragedy true understand wish Wittgenstein words wrong