Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of EssaysCambridge University Press, 6 באוק׳ 2015 In this classic collection of wide-ranging and interdisciplinary essays, Stanley Cavell explores a remarkably broad range of philosophical issues from politics and ethics to the arts and philosophy. The essays explore issues as diverse as the opposing approaches of 'analytic' and 'Continental' philosophy, modernism, Wittgenstein, abstract expressionism and Schoenberg, Shakespeare on human needs, the difficulties of authorship, Kierkegaard and post-Enlightenment religion. Presented in a fresh twenty-first century series livery, and including a specially commissioned preface, written by Stephen Mulhall, illuminating its continuing importance and relevance to philosophical enquiry, this influential work is now available for a new generation of readers. |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-5 מתוך 69
עמוד
... relations between the histories of science and of philosophy; of the countless occasions on which I have learned about continental philosophy and literature from Kurt Fischer, in everything from isolated remarks to the course of ...
... relations between the histories of science and of philosophy; of the countless occasions on which I have learned about continental philosophy and literature from Kurt Fischer, in everything from isolated remarks to the course of ...
עמוד
... relation to the world, and others, and myself, that I do in fact, to an unknown extent, inescapably know (barring physical or psychic trauma), and that I chronically do not know or cannot say what I mean, and that I can know further by ...
... relation to the world, and others, and myself, that I do in fact, to an unknown extent, inescapably know (barring physical or psychic trauma), and that I chronically do not know or cannot say what I mean, and that I can know further by ...
עמוד
... relation to Kant's transcendental logic (Must We Mean ... ? p. 13), namely as the sense of uncovering the necessary conditions of the shared world; but not until the second essay of the book, “The Availability of Wittgenstein's Later ...
... relation to Kant's transcendental logic (Must We Mean ... ? p. 13), namely as the sense of uncovering the necessary conditions of the shared world; but not until the second essay of the book, “The Availability of Wittgenstein's Later ...
עמוד
... relation between epistemology and ethics, or knowledge and the justification of confrontation, call it the articulation of the standing from which to question conduct and character, of oneself and of another, in differentiation from the ...
... relation between epistemology and ethics, or knowledge and the justification of confrontation, call it the articulation of the standing from which to question conduct and character, of oneself and of another, in differentiation from the ...
עמוד
... then not satisfyingly, and not again, it turned out, for twenty years), and more immediately prompted by the idea of continuing the issue of my relation to my language by relating it to Kant's idea of my capacity to give objectivity.
... then not satisfyingly, and not again, it turned out, for twenty years), and more immediately prompted by the idea of continuing the issue of my relation to my language by relating it to Kant's idea of my capacity to give objectivity.
תוכן
The availability of Wittgensteins later philosophy | |
Aesthetic problems of modern philosophy | |
Austin at criticism | |
A reading of Becketts | |
Kierkegaards On Authority and Revelation | |
Music discomposed | |
A matter of meaning | |
Knowing and acknowledging | |
A reading of King Lear | |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2015 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
accept acknowledgment action aesthetic analytical philosophy answer Antony Flew appeal artist audience Austin's Beckett become believe book on Adler characters claim Clov concept context Cordelia course criticism deny Edgar Endgame epistemology essay example experience explanation expression fact father feel Gloucester Gloucester’s God’s Hamm Hamm’s happening human idea imagine intention Investigations irrelevant J. O. Urmson justified Kant Kierkegaard King Lear knowledge language game Lear’s logical matter mean meant merely mind modern moral motive nature Nietzsche object obvious one’s ordinary language ordinary language philosophy ourselves pain paraphrase particular perhaps person philosophical Philosophical Investigations play poem Pop Art present problem question reason relation relevant response revealed rules scene seems sense Shakespeare simply skeptic someone speak specific statements suggest suppose tell theater thing thought tradition tragedy true understand wish Wittgenstein words wrong