Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of EssaysCambridge University Press, 6 באוק׳ 2015 In this classic collection of wide-ranging and interdisciplinary essays, Stanley Cavell explores a remarkably broad range of philosophical issues from politics and ethics to the arts and philosophy. The essays explore issues as diverse as the opposing approaches of 'analytic' and 'Continental' philosophy, modernism, Wittgenstein, abstract expressionism and Schoenberg, Shakespeare on human needs, the difficulties of authorship, Kierkegaard and post-Enlightenment religion. Presented in a fresh twenty-first century series livery, and including a specially commissioned preface, written by Stephen Mulhall, illuminating its continuing importance and relevance to philosophical enquiry, this influential work is now available for a new generation of readers. |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-5 מתוך 47
עמוד
... justification of confrontation, call it the articulation of the standing from which to question conduct and character, of oneself and of another, in differentiation from the standing to confront claims to knowledge. The main courses I ...
... justification of confrontation, call it the articulation of the standing from which to question conduct and character, of oneself and of another, in differentiation from the standing to confront claims to knowledge. The main courses I ...
עמוד
... justification from within that position. A clear instance of such a Kantian term of criticism is his characterization of an opposed “Idealism” as making the world “empirically ideal and transcendentally real”; another is his diagnosis ...
... justification from within that position. A clear instance of such a Kantian term of criticism is his characterization of an opposed “Idealism” as making the world “empirically ideal and transcendentally real”; another is his diagnosis ...
עמוד
... justification from within one's own procedures. It often happens that what makes an article or passage famous is its enunciation of a thesis which the profession is fully prepared to annihilate. The refuting of Mill on “desirable,” or ...
... justification from within one's own procedures. It often happens that what makes an article or passage famous is its enunciation of a thesis which the profession is fully prepared to annihilate. The refuting of Mill on “desirable,” or ...
עמוד
... justification of statements of the first two types, and especially with the second. Even without attempting to be more precise about these differences, the nature of the clash between Ryle and Austin becomes somewhat clearer. Notice ...
... justification of statements of the first two types, and especially with the second. Even without attempting to be more precise about these differences, the nature of the clash between Ryle and Austin becomes somewhat clearer. Notice ...
עמוד
הגעת למגבלת הצפייה עבור ספר זה מדוע?.
הגעת למגבלת הצפייה עבור ספר זה מדוע?.
תוכן
The availability of Wittgensteins later philosophy | |
Aesthetic problems of modern philosophy | |
Austin at criticism | |
A reading of Becketts | |
Kierkegaards On Authority and Revelation | |
Music discomposed | |
A matter of meaning | |
Knowing and acknowledging | |
A reading of King Lear | |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2015 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
accept acknowledgment action aesthetic analytical philosophy answer Antony Flew appeal artist audience Austin's Beckett become believe book on Adler characters claim Clov concept context Cordelia course criticism deny Edgar Endgame epistemology essay example experience explanation expression fact father feel Gloucester Gloucester’s God’s Hamm Hamm’s happening human idea imagine intention Investigations irrelevant J. O. Urmson justified Kant Kierkegaard King Lear knowledge language game Lear’s logical matter mean meant merely mind modern moral motive nature Nietzsche object obvious one’s ordinary language ordinary language philosophy ourselves pain paraphrase particular perhaps person philosophical Philosophical Investigations play poem Pop Art present problem question reason relation relevant response revealed rules scene seems sense Shakespeare simply skeptic someone speak specific statements suggest suppose tell theater thing thought tradition tragedy true understand wish Wittgenstein words wrong