Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of EssaysCambridge University Press, 6 באוק׳ 2015 In this classic collection of wide-ranging and interdisciplinary essays, Stanley Cavell explores a remarkably broad range of philosophical issues from politics and ethics to the arts and philosophy. The essays explore issues as diverse as the opposing approaches of 'analytic' and 'Continental' philosophy, modernism, Wittgenstein, abstract expressionism and Schoenberg, Shakespeare on human needs, the difficulties of authorship, Kierkegaard and post-Enlightenment religion. Presented in a fresh twenty-first century series livery, and including a specially commissioned preface, written by Stephen Mulhall, illuminating its continuing importance and relevance to philosophical enquiry, this influential work is now available for a new generation of readers. |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-5 מתוך 41
עמוד
... imagine themselves able to answer for. I cannot forgo the pleasure of thanking my teachers of philosophy—Henry David Aiken, Abraham Kaplan, and Morton White—especially for their encouragement to think of, or to remember, philosophy as ...
... imagine themselves able to answer for. I cannot forgo the pleasure of thanking my teachers of philosophy—Henry David Aiken, Abraham Kaplan, and Morton White—especially for their encouragement to think of, or to remember, philosophy as ...
עמוד
... imagine its never coming to pass. I call it, on its title page, a Book of Essays, having found that the interaction of the essays, despite the differences of their causes, have the feel of a sequence of chapters as much as a collection ...
... imagine its never coming to pass. I call it, on its title page, a Book of Essays, having found that the interaction of the essays, despite the differences of their causes, have the feel of a sequence of chapters as much as a collection ...
עמוד
... imagine that if it has a sound answer the answer must be obvious or immediate? But it is no easier to say who speaks for all men than it is to speak for all men. And why should that be easier than knowing whether a man speaks for me? It ...
... imagine that if it has a sound answer the answer must be obvious or immediate? But it is no easier to say who speaks for all men than it is to speak for all men. And why should that be easier than knowing whether a man speaks for me? It ...
עמוד
הגעת למגבלת הצפייה עבור ספר זה מדוע?.
הגעת למגבלת הצפייה עבור ספר זה מדוע?.
עמוד
הגעת למגבלת הצפייה עבור ספר זה מדוע?.
הגעת למגבלת הצפייה עבור ספר זה מדוע?.
תוכן
The availability of Wittgensteins later philosophy | |
Aesthetic problems of modern philosophy | |
Austin at criticism | |
A reading of Becketts | |
Kierkegaards On Authority and Revelation | |
Music discomposed | |
A matter of meaning | |
Knowing and acknowledging | |
A reading of King Lear | |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2015 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
accept acknowledgment action aesthetic analytical philosophy answer Antony Flew appeal artist audience Austin's Beckett become believe book on Adler characters claim Clov concept context Cordelia course criticism deny Edgar Endgame epistemology essay example experience explanation expression fact father feel Gloucester Gloucester’s God’s Hamm Hamm’s happening human idea imagine intention Investigations irrelevant J. O. Urmson justified Kant Kierkegaard King Lear knowledge language game Lear’s logical matter mean meant merely mind modern moral motive nature Nietzsche object obvious one’s ordinary language ordinary language philosophy ourselves pain paraphrase particular perhaps person philosophical Philosophical Investigations play poem Pop Art present problem question reason relation relevant response revealed rules scene seems sense Shakespeare simply skeptic someone speak specific statements suggest suppose tell theater thing thought tradition tragedy true understand wish Wittgenstein words wrong