תמונות בעמוד
PDF
ePub

the Pelagian and other controversies of this century. Vincentius of Lerins has transmitted his name to posterity by a short but elegant tract against the sects which he entitled Commonitorium. I designedly pass over Sidonius Apollinaris, a tumid writer, though not destitute of eloquence, Vigilius

the last among the Latins of this century | tain' and Marius Mercator are well known who treated moral subjects skilfully and to every one who has paid any attention to eloquently.' Pontius [Paulinus] of Nola, highly esteemed by the ancients for his piety, has recommended himself to posterity by his poems and by some other things.2 Peter, bishop of Ravenna, acquired the surname of Chrysologus on account of his eloquence, and his discourses are not entirely destitute of genius. Salvian was an eloquent but a gloomy and austere writer, who in the vehemence of his declamation against the vices of the times unwarily discloses the weaknesses and defects of his own character. Prosper of Aqui-dressed a letter to Augustine, acquainting him with

3

1 Concerning Eucherius, the Benedictine monks treat largely in their Hist. Littér, de la France, tome ii. p. 275. [He was of an honourable family in Gaul, fond of monkery in his youth, and resided some time in a monastery in the island Lerins. But he afterwards married and had two sons, Salonius and Veranius, who became bishops. He was bishop of Lyons from A.D. 434 to A.D. 454. His most admired work is his epistle to Valerianus, On Contempt of the World and Secular Philosophy. Besides this he wrote in praise of monkery, instructions for his sons, and a few homilies. Several works are falsely ascribed to him. The whole were published, Basil, 1531, and Rome, 1564, 4to, and in the Biblioth. Patr. tom. vi.-Mur. [See also Smith's Dict. of Greek and Rom. Biog. vol. ii. p. 62.—R.

See the Hist. Littér, de la France, tome ii. p. 179. The works of Paulinus were published by Le Brun, Paris, 1685, two vols. 4to. [See note 2, p. 140, on the preceding century, where he is particularly described. Mur. [and Smith, ubi supra, vol. iii. p. 144.-R. 3 See Agnelli, Liber Pontificalis Eccles. Ravennat. tom. i. p. 321, ed. Bachinii. [Peter Chrysologus was an Italian of a noble family. He was born at Imola, and educated under the bishop of that see. In the year 433 he was made bishop of Ravenna, where he died about A.D. 450. He has left us one hundred and fortyseven short homilies or sermons, and one epistle addressed to Eutyches the heretic in the year 449. His works have been often published; the latest edition is, perhaps, that of Venice, 1742, fol.-Mur. [A still later edition is that by Sebast. Paul, published also at Venice in 1750, fol.-R.

4 See Hist. Littér, de la France, tome ii. p. 517. [The authors of the history here referred to give a different account of Salvian's character. They acknowledge that his declamation against the vices of the age, in his Treatise against Avarice and his Discourse concerning Providence, are warm and vehement; but they represent him notwithstanding as one of the most humane and benevolent men of his time.-Macl. [Salvian was a native of Gaul, probably of Cologne, lived long at Treves, and married a pagan lady, who however became a Christian after marriage, and had one child, a daughter. At length he removed to the south of France and became a presbyter of Marseilles, where he lived to a great age. He flourished as early as 440, but was alive, though an old man, in the year 495. See Gennadius (who was a contemporary presbyter of Marseilles), De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis, cap. 67. The works of Salvian now extant are, 1. On the Providence and Government of God and his Righteous Temporal Jude ments. 2. Nine epistles. 3. Against Avarice, especially in Clergymen and Bishops. His style is barbarous, yet vivid and energetic. His conceptions are clear, his reasoning pungent, and his sentiments for the most part correct. Yet his descriptions are coarse and often too highly coloured, and his positions sometimes untenable. The works of Salvian have been often published. The best edition is that of Baluze, Paris, 1669, 8vo.- Mur. [Perhaps a still better is the collection of his works in Gallandius, Biblio. Patrum. v. x. They have been translated into French, Paris, 1735, 12mo, and his well-known treatise on God's Government into English, by R. T. Lond. 1700, 8vo. See also Lardner's Credibility, &c. vol. v. p. 64.-R.

5 For a good account of Prosper, see the Hist. Littér. de la France, tome ii. p. 369. [Tiro Prosper, a layman but a learned theologian of Aquitain in Gaul, flourished A.D. 444. He was a great admirer and an able defender of the doctrines of Augustine respecting original sin,

predestination and free grace. In the year 426 he ad

the incipient progress of Pelagian errors in Gaul, and Isoliciting him to write against them. In 431 he visited Italy to procure the aid of the Roman pontiff against these errors, and returned strengthened by a doctrinal letter addressed to the bishops of Gaul. In 433 he wrote his strictures on the thirteenth Collatio of Cassian, which is an able performance. In 443 Leo L. called him to Rome and made him his private secretary, and employed him in the Pelagian contests of Italy. He was alive in 455, but the time of his death is unknown. He was a man of strong reasoning powers, soundly orthodox, and a good model in controversial writing. Most of his works are in defence of the doctrines of original sin, predestination, and free grace; and especially his two books (if indeed they are his) De l'oratione Gentium (on the offer of salvation to all men), will be read with interest by the modern theologian. He also composed a Chronicon, continuing that of Eusebius down to A.D. 455, a commentary on the last fifty Psalms, several letters, and some poems. His works were published, Paris, 1711, fol. and by Salina, Rome, 1732, 8vo. Mur.

6 Marius Mercator was probably an African, yet may have lived some time in Italy. He was undoubtedly a layman, a friend and admirer of Augustine, and an active defender of his doctrines from A.D. 418 to the year 451. His works are almost wholly translations from the Greek fathers, particularly Nestorius, Theodorus of Mopsuestia, Cyril of Alexandria, Proclus, Theodoret, &c. accompanied with prefaces and notes or strictures by the translator. They are all designed to confute either the Nestorian or the Pelagian errors, and were edited, with copious notes, by Garnier, Paris, 1673, fol. and still better by Baluze, Paris, 1684, 8vo.-Mur.

7 A good account of Vincentius of Lerins is found in the Hist. Littér, de la France, tome ii. p. 305. [He was born of a noble family at Toul in the French Netherlands, became a soldier, and afterwards a monk at Lerins, where he was made a presbyter. He flourished A.D. 434 and died before the year 450. He was probably a semi-Pelagian, as may be inferred from his Objections against the writings and doctrines of Augustine, which (though lost) are confuted by Prosper of Aquitain. His only surviving work is his Commonitorium adversus Hæreticos. This he re-wrote but lost the copy, and therefore added notes to the first draft. It is an attempt to confute all heresies at once, by showing what are the marks of the true church as distinguished from all errorists. It has been often published, e.g. by Baluze, subjoined to Salvian's works, Paris, 1669, 8vo, and Cambridge, 1687, 12mo.-Mur. [Also by Jo. Salinas, with the works of Hilary, Rome, 1701, 8vo, the best edition. The Commonitorium is a favourite book with the Romanists, being one of their most plausible defences of tradition as the rule of faith. It was translated into French, Paris, 1686, 12mo; into German. by Feder, Bamberg, 1785, 8vo; and into English, London, 1651; by Reeves, in his Primitive Apologies, Lond. 1709, vol. ii. and anonymously, along with a reprint of the Latin text, at Oxford, 1836, 12mo, being one of the significant indications of the rise of Puseyism.-R.

8 C. Sollius Apollinaris Sidonius was born of a noble family at Lyons in France, A.D. 431. His father ana grandfather both bore the name of Apollinaris, and both were prætorian prefects of the Gallias. After an expensive education he became a soldier, married the daughter of Avitus who was afterwards emperor, had

of Tapsus, Arnobius junior, who commented on the Psalms of David, Dracontius,3 and others, who were of a secondary rank.

three children, was captured at the siege of Lyons, A.D. 457, yet was advanced to honour by the new emperor Majorianus whom he eulogized in 458, had a statue erected to him, and was advanced to the dignity of count. In the year 467 he went to Rome as legate from the city of Clermont, pronounced a eulogy on the emperor Anthemius, was made prefect of Rome, and performed his duties so faithfully that he had another statue decreed him, was made a patrician and a senator of Rome. In the year 472 he was almost compelled to accept the office of bishop of Clermont in France. He now laid aside all his civil honours, gave up his property to his son, and devoted himself to sacred studies and to his episcopal functions. His influence among the clergy and the churches was very great. When the Goths attacked Clermont he put himself at the head of the citizens as their military commander, and when the city was captured in 430 he retired in safety, was restored to his see, and died in the year 482. He has left numerous epistles published, with one sermon, and twenty-four poetic effusions interspersed. Several of his works in prose and verse are lost. His works were published by Sirmond, Paris, 1614, 8vo, and with additional notes, Paris, 1652, 8vo. His epistles are useful, as throwing light on the history of his times.-Mur.

1 Vigilius, bishop of Tapsus in Africa, flourished A.D. 484, at which time he was summoned to appear at Carthage before Hunneric, the Arian king of the Vandals, and give account of his faith. He boldly professed orthodoxy, but the persecution which followed obliged him to quit Africa, and he retired to Constantinople, and after some years removed to Italy, where he composed several, perhaps the greater part of his works. To conceal himself from his persecuting enemies he composed much under borrowed names, and especially that of Athanasius. During the middle ages he was confounded with Vigilius of Trent, who flourished at the beginning of this century. His works are all directed against the Arians and the Nestorian heresy. He is supposed to be the author of that confession of faith which is commonly called the Athanasian Creed. His works were first published as his by Chifflet, Dijon, 1664, 4to-Mur.

An account of Arnobius junior is given in the list. Littér, de la France, tome ii. p. 342. [He is called junior, to distinguish him from the African Arnobius, who lived at the beginning of the preceding century. This Arnobius junior is supposed to have lived in Gaul. He flourished about A.D. 461, and wrote a Commentary on the Psalms, notes on some passages in the Gospels, and a Dispute with Serapion of Egypt respecting the Trinity, the person of Christ, and the consis. teney of grace with free will. He was a semi-Pelagian. His works are in the Biblioth. Patr. tom. viii. p. 203, &c.-Mur.

3 Dracontius was a presbyter and a poet, probably of Spain, who flourished A.D. 440, and was alive in 450. He has left us a heroic poem on the Creation or the Hexaémeron, and an elegy on Theodosius II. both published by Sirmond, Paris, 1619, 8vo, and in the Biblioth. Patr. tom. ix. pages 724, 729.- Mur.

4 Catalogue of Latin writers omitted by Mosheim, extracted from Cave's Historia Literaria.

Chromatius, bishop of Aquileia, a friend of Rufinus and a defender of Chrysostom, flourished A.D. 401 and died 410. He has left us some Homilies on the Beatitudes, and a few Epistles.

Innocent I. bishop of Rome A.D. 402-417, a firm friend of Chrysostom and strenuous against the Nestorians and Pelagians. Of thirty-four Epistles published as his the genuineness of nearly all is questioned.

Zosimus, of Greek extract, bishop of Rome a D. 417 -418. famous for his attempt to subject the African churches to his see. He has left us thirteen Epistles. Boniface, bishop of Rome A.D. 418-423, prosecuted the attempt of Zosimus. We have three of his Epistles. Severus, bishop of Minorca, flourished A.D. 418. His Epistle, describing the conversion of the Jews of Minorea, was published by Baronius, Annales, ad ann. 418. Jalian, an Italian bishop, born before A.D. 386, and iled about the year 440 or 450. He studied under Pe

lagius, became a deacon, lector, husband, and bishop of

a small town among the Hirpini. In the year 417 he came out an open defender of Pelagianism, in 420 he was condemned, went to Constantinople, and thence to Cilicia, where he lived long with Theodorus of Mopsuestia, and devoted himself to writing in defence of his sentiments. In 423 he was condemned by a synod of Cilician bishops, returned to Italy in 424, hoping to recover his see; failed and went again to Constantinople to beg the interference of the emperor, but here Mercator's Commonitorium to Theodosius II. met him and blasted his prospects. Being driven from Constantinople and condemned in a council at Rome A.D. 431, he pretended to renounce his errors, and applied to the Roman pontiff in 439 to restore him to his see, but in vain. He was a man of superior talents, well acquainted with the scriptures, and so eloquent that he was styled the Roman Demosthenes. He was also famed for his piety and benevolence to the poor; but he was accused of dissembling his sentiments, and of using bitter language towards his adversaries. Large extracts are preserved from his Epistles, his Commentary on the Canticles, and his twelve books against the first and second books of Augustine on marriage.

Priscus Fastidius, a British bishop, flourished A.D. 420. He has left us a Tract on Christian life and widowhood addressed to a pious widow, extant among the Works of Augustine, tom. ix.

Evodius, bishop of Uzala in Africa, an intimate friend of Augustine, flourished A.D. 420. Four of his Epistles to Augustine and one book De Fide Contra Manichæos are extant among the Works of Augustine.

Isidorus, bishop of Cordova in Spain, flourished A.D. 420 and died A.D. 430. He was probably the author of four books of Allegories or Commentaries on all the books of Kings, extant among the Works of Isidorus Hispalensis.

Cælestine, bishop of Rome A.D. 423-432, and active in the Nestorian contests. He has left us fourteen Epistles.

Lupus, bishop of Troyes in France, flourished A.D. 427. He was sent by the Gallic bishops to Britain in 429 to root out Pelagianism, was successful, and returned in 430, and died A.D. 479. He has been pronounced one of the greatest men of his age. Two of his epistles are extant.

Pisidius or Possidonius, bishop of Calama near Hippo in Africa, flourished A.D. 430. He was an intimate friend of Augustine, and wrote his life and a catalogue of his works, still extant among the works of Augustine.

Hilary, bishop of Arles, born A.D. 401, became a monk of Lerins, and was made bishop in 430 and died in 449. As metropolitan of Arles, he deposed Celidonius bishop of Vienne, who appealed to Rome and was supported by Leo I. which involved Hilary in war with Leo all their lives. He wrote the life of St. Honoratus his predecessor, heroic poems on Genesis, one epistle to Eucherius of Lyons, two others to Augustine, and an account of the miracles of St. Genesius, all which were published by the Benedictines, Paris, 1693, folio, and by Salina, Rome, 1701, 8vo.

Capreolus, bishop of Carthage, flourished A.D. 431. His epistle to the council of Ephesus and another to the Spanish bishop against Nestorius, are extant in Baronius and in other collections.

Patricius (St. Patrick, the apostle of Ireland). See Note 3, p. 175.

Sixtus III. bishop of Rome A.D. 432-440, has left us several epistles. The three books on riches, chastity, false teachers, &c. are erroneously ascribed to him.

Adrian, who lived perhaps about A.D. 450, wrote an Isagoge in S. Scripturam, which is extant in Poole's Synopsis Critic. Sacr. tom. vi. p. 11.

Maximus, a Gallic monk, abbot of Lerins in 426 and bishop of Riez in France A.D. 433, lived till 451 or longer, and wrote several homilies, which are extant among those of Eusebius of Emesa and Eucherius of Lyons.

Claudius Marius Victor or Victorinus, a rhetorician and poet of Marseilles, flourished A.D. 434, and died before A.D. 450. He wrote a Poetic Commentary on Genesis to the death of Abraham, a poetic Epistle to the abbot Solomon on the corrupt morals of the age, both extant, Paris, 1560, 8vo, and in the Biblioth. Patr. tom. viii. p. 580.

Cælius Sedulius, a Scotchman and poet, who flourished A.D. 434. He studied in Italy, became a presby

CHAPTER III.

HISTORY OF THEOLOGY.

1. In the controversies which in this century agitated nearly all Christendom, many points of theology were more fully explained and more accurately defined than they had been before. Thus it was with the doctrine concerning Christ, his person and natures; and those concerning the innate depravity of the human soul, the natural ability of men to live and act as the law of God requires, the necessity of divine ter, and perhaps a bishop. His works were collected by Asterius towards the close of this century, comprising Carmen Paschale (on the miracles of Christ) Veteris et Novi Test. Collatio, an elegiac poem, Peun Alphabeticus de Christo, in Iambic measure (on the life of Christ), and Paschale Opus in prose, An Exposition of all the Epistles of Paul is falsely ascribed to him. The works of Sedulius have been published repeatedly, and are to be found in the Biblioth. Patr. tom. vi.[The best edition is in the fourth volume of the Poeta Christiana of F. Arevalus, Rome, 1788-94, in four vols. 4to. This collection includes the works of Prudentius, Dracontius, Juvencus, and Sedulius. The Paschale Opus in prose is merely another version by the author himself of his poem entitled Carmen Paschale.-R.

Valerianus, a bishop in the maritime Alps, flourished A.D. 439, and was alive in 455. His twenty homilies and an epistle were published by Sirmond, Paris, 1612, 8vo, also in the Biblio. Patrumatom. viii.

Eustathius flourished A.D. 440, the neat Latin translator of St. Basil's nine homilies on the Hexaëmeron, extant among the works of Basil the Great.

Philippus, a presbyter and disciple of Jerome, flourished A.D. 440, and died A.D. 455. He wrote a Commentary on Job, published, Basil, 1527, 4to and fol. It has been ascribed both to Bede and to Jerome.

Idatius or Hydatius, a Spanish bishop who flourished A.D. 445, and died A.D. 468. He wrote a Chronicon from A.D. 379 to A.D. 428, and afterwards continued it to A.D. 467, first published entire by Sirmond, Paris, 1619, 8vo, and since in the works of Sirmond, Paris, 1696, and Venice, 1729. It is barbarous in style and frequently inaccurate as to facts, yet affords valuable aid in tracing the movements of the Goths and Suevi. Zacheus, the reputed author of three books of discussion between Zachæus a Christian and Apollonius a pagan, in regard to Christianity. The book was probably written about A.D. 450, and is published in D'Achery's Spicilegium, tom. x.

Salonius, son of Eucherius, bishop of Lyons, and himself a Gallic bishop, flourished A.D. 453. He wrote an Exposition of the Parables of Solomon, and a Mystical Paraphrase on Ecclesiastes, both extant in the Orthodoxographia, and in Biblio. Patrum, tom. viii.

Victorius or Victorinus, a Gallic mathematician, flourished A.D. 457, author of a Paschal Canon in two parts; the first part exhibits the principles and the method of calculating Easter, the second is a table of Easter days from A.D. 28 to A.D. 457. This Canon was recommended by the council of Orleans, A.D. 451, and was first published by Bucherius, Antw. 1634, fol.

Hilary, bishop of Rome, A.D. 461-467. He was the bishop of Rome's legate to the council of Ephesus in 449. Twelve of his Epistles are extant.

Paulinus Petricordius or Vesuntius (i. e. of Besançon), a Gallic poet, who flourished A.D. 461, and is often confounded with Paulinus of Nola. He wrote De l'ita Sti Martini, an uninteresting poem, extant in the Biblio. Patrum, tom. vi. and published by Daunius, with notes, Lips. 1686, 8vo.

Claudius Mamertus, a Gallic poet, a presbyter, and assistant to the bishop of Vienne, flourished A.D. 462. He wrote De Statu Animi, two Epistles, a Poem against various errors, and a Hymn on the Crucifizion, all extant In the Didoto. Patrum, tom. vii.

simpialus, bishop of Rome. A.D. 467-483

He was

grace in order to salvation, human liberty, and the like. For that devout and venerable simplicity of the first ages of the church, which taught men to believe when God speaks and to obey when God commands, appeared to the leading doctors of this age to be clownish and vulgar. Many of those however who attempted to explain and illustrate these doctrines, opened the way rather for disputation than for a rational faith and a holy life; for they did not so much explain as involve in greater obscurity and darken with ambiguous terms and incomprehensible distinctions the deep mys

much engaged in contests with the eastern patriarchs, and has left us nineteen Epistles, extant in the Concilia, tom. iv.

Ruricius senior, bishop of Limoges in France, flourished A.D. 470, but was alive in 536. He has left us two books of Epistles, published by Canisius, Antiq. Lectiones, tom. v. (or tom. i. of new ed.) and in the Biblio. Patrum, tom. viii.

Remigius, bishop of Rheims, A.D. 471-533. He baptized Clovis, king of the Franks, with many of his lords, was a man of note, and has left us five Epistles, together with his Will. The Exposition of Paul's Epistles attributed to him is not his.

Faustus, abbot of Lerins and then bishop of Riez in France, A.D. 472-480 or 485, a semi-Pelagian. His works are, De Gratia Dei et Libero Arbitrio, with several Sermons, Epistles, and Tracts, collected in Biblio. Patrum, tom. viii.

Felix, bishop of Rome, A.D. 483-492; was much in. controversy with the eastern patriarchs. Fifteen of his Epistles are extant.

Victor Vitensis, an orthodox African bishop who fled to Constantinople A.D. 487. and there composed & History of the Persecutions in Africa under Genseric and Hunneric, kings of the Vandals. It was published with Optatus Milevitanus, Paris, 1659, 8vo, with Vigilius Tapsensis, Dijon, 1664, 4to, and in the Biblio. Patrum, tom. viii.

Alcimus Ecdicius Avitus, bishop of Clermont, A.D. 490-523. He has left us five poetic books On the Creation and Fall of Man, the Flood, and the Passage of the Red Sea, a poem in praise of Virginity, eightyseven epistles, and some sermons, published by Sirmond, Paris, 1463, and in the Biblio. Patrum, tom. ix. [See an account of his life and writings in Smith's Greek and Rom. Biog. vol. i. p. 434.-R.

Gelasius, bishop of Rome, A.D. 492-496. Sixteen of his epistles and fragments of various other works are extant. The famous decree of a Roman council, A.D. 494, De Libris Canonicis, Ecclesiasticis, et Apocryphis, ascribed to Gelasius, is of dubious authenticity.

Gennadius, a presbyter of Marseilles, flourished A.D. 495, and wrote De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis, or a catalogue of authors continuing Jerome's catalogue from the year 393 to A.D. 495. His book De Fide and his Life of Jerome are also extant. But his works against all the heresies, against Nestorius, and against Pelagius, his tract on the Millenium, and his translations from the Greek fathers, are lost.

Rusticus Elpidius, physician to Theodoric, king of the Goths, flourished about A.D. 498, and has left twenty-four epigrams on Scriptural facts, and a poëm on the Benefits of Christ.

Julianus Pomerius of Mauritania, a teacher of rhetoric at Arles and a presbyter there, flourished A.D. 498. His work De Anima, and several smaller ones, are lost But his treatise De Vita Contemplativa, is extant among the works of Prosper, to whom it has been wrongly ascribed.

Symmachus, bishop of Rome, A.D. 498-514, famous for his excommunication of the emperor Anastasius, has left us twelve epistles.-Mur. [To this list should be added the names of Nicetas or Nicæas of Romacia, mentioned below at page 192, and Nicetas, bishop of Aquileia, several tracts by whom have been recently published by Cardinal Mai, in his Script. Vet. nova Collectio, vol. vii part i. pages 314-340.-R.

teries of revealed religion; and hence arose | mages, the superstitious offices of devotion abundant matter for those difficulties, con- paid by the living to the souls of the dead, tentions, and animosities which have flowed the multiplication and extravagant veneradown to succeeding ages, and which can tion of temples, chapels and aitars, and scarcely be removed by the efforts of human innumerable other proofs of degenerate power. It hardly need be remarked that piety, I forbear to speak particularly. As some, while pressing their adversaries, in- no one in those times objected to Christians cautiously fell into the opposite errors retaining the opinions of their pagan anceswhich were no less dangerous. tors respecting the soul, heroes, demons, 2. The superstitious notions and human temples, and the like, and their transferring devices by which religion was before much them into their devotions; and as no one clogged, were very considerably augmented. proposed utterly to abolish the ancient The aid of departed saints was implored pagan institutions but only to alter them with supplications by vast multitudes, and somewhat and purify them, it was unavoidno one censured this absurd devotion. Nor able that the religion and the worship of did the question which afterwards occa- Christians should in this way become corsioned much debate—namely, in what way rupted. This also I will add, that the the prayers of mortals could reach the ears doctrine of the purification of souls after of residents in heaven, present any difficul-death by means of some sort of fire, which ties to the Christians of those times. For afterwards became so great a source of they did not suppose the souls of departed wealth to the clergy, acquired in this age a saints to be so confined to the celestial fuller development and greater influence." mansions, as not to have liberty of paying visits to mortals and of travelling over various regions at their pleasure. These unembodied spirits were supposed to be frequent and willing visitors at the places where their bodies were buried; and this opinion transmitted to Christians from the Greeks and Romans, drew a great conflux of supplicants to the sepulchres of the saints. The images of those who were in reputation for sanctity while alive, were now honoured with extraordinary devotion in several places; and there were those who believed what the pagan priests had maintained respecting the statues of Jupiter and Mercury-namely, that those inhabitants of heaven were favourably present in these their images. The bones of martyrs and the sign of the cross, were supposed to be the most sovereign remedy against the assaults of demons and all other calamities, and to have power not only to heal diseases of the body, but likewise those of the mind. Of the public processions, the holy pilgri

On the rise and spread of this intercession of departed spirits and other innovations referred to in this paragraph, see Gieseler's Lehrbuch, &c. sec. 99, or see. 97, in Cunningham's Translation, Philad. 1836. This translation will henceforth be referred to, being the only extant English translation, as the second volume of Dr. Davidson's more accurate translation of Gleseler's later edition was not published when these sheets were passing through the press [June, 1847].-R.

Lactantius, Divinar. Instit. lib. i. p. 164; Hesiod, Opp. et Dier. line 122; with which compare Sulpitius Severus, Epist. ii. p. 371; Dial. ii. cap. xiii. p. 474; Dial. iii. p. 65; Macarius, in Tollius, Insignia Itineris Italici, p. 197, and other writers of that age.

3 Clementina, Homil. x. in Patr. Apostol. tom. i. p. 697, Arnobius, Adr. Gentes, lib. vi. p. 254, &c; Barthius. Ad Rutilium Numantian. p. 250.

3. The number of those who devoted their talents to the explanation of the Scriptures was not so great as in the preceding century, when there was less controversy among Christians; and yet the number was not small. I pass over those who expounded but one or only a few books of Scripture, Victor of Antioch, Polychronius, Philo of Carpathus, Isidore of Cordova, Salonius, and Andreas of Cæsarea. The two most distinguished interpreters of this century who explained a great part of the sacred volume, and not altogether without success, were, Theodoret, bishop of Cyrus, and Theodorus of Mopsuestia. Both possessed genius and learning, and neither would follow in the footsteps of preceding expositors without some reason. The expositions of the former are before the public; those of the latter lie concealed in the East among the Nestorians for various reasons, and are worthy to see the light. Cyril of Alexandria deserves a place among the interpreters, but a far more honourable

5 These pilgrimages were then so common that some Christians fell into absurdities truly ridiculous. They journeyed quite to Arabia in order to see the dunghill on which the diseased Job sat, and to kiss the ground which had absorbed his precious blood; as Chrysostom describes it (Homily v. to the Antiochians) where he says in his rhetorical way, that the dunghill of Job was more venerable than the throne of a king.- Schl.

6 On this subject Augustine deserves especially to be consulted, De Octo Quaestionibus ad Dulcitium Liber, cap. xiii. Opp. tom. vi. p. 128, De Fide et Operibus cap. xvi. p. 182, De Fide, Spe, et Caritate, sec. cxviii p. 222, Exposition of Psalm xxxv. sec. iii. &c.

7 See Simon, Hist. Crit. des Princip. Comment. du Nouv. Test. chap. xxii. p. 314, and Crit de la Biblio. Eccles, de M. Du Pin tome i. p. 180 [and note 4, p. 183, above.-Mur.

8 Asseman, Biblioth. Oriental. Clement. Vatic. tom 4 Prudentius, Hymn. xi. De Coronis, pages 150, 151; iii. sec. ii. p. 227; Simon, Crit. de la Biblioth. Eccles Sulpicius Severus, Epist. i. p. 364; Eneas Gazeus, | par M. Du Pin, tome i. pages 108,677. [See also note Theophrastus, p. 173, ed. Barth.

4, p. 184 above.-Mur.

one is due to Isidore of Pelusium, whose | it, for to this day they preserve his books epistles contain much which tends to eluci- with care, and venerate him as a saint of date and explain the holy Scriptures.1 the highest order.

4. Most of these interpreters, whether 6. It is very evident that the doctrines Greeks or Latins, everywhere copy after of religion were not exhibited with due Origen, and despising the genuine and ob- purity and simplicity by most persons, but vious meaning of the Scriptures, search were sometimes with uncommendable zeal after abstruse senses, or what the Latins of expanded beyond what was revealed, were that age called mysteries, in the plainest anatomized with too great art and subpassages and sentences of the Bible. Some tlety, and were supported not so much by of the Greeks indeed, and in particular Scripture evidence, as by the authority and Theodoret, laboured not unsuccessfully in reasonings of the ancient doctors. I know explaining the pages of the New Testa- of no one who embraced a complete system ment, which we may ascribe to their skill of Christian doctrines in a single work, unin the Greek language, with which they had less Nicæas of Romacia may be considered been familiar from their infancy; but upon as doing this in the six books of instruction the Hebrew Scriptures neither the Greeks for Neophytes which he is said to have comnor the Latins cast much light. Nearly all posed. But it has been already observed who attempted to explain them, making no that various doctrines of religion were use of their judgment, applied the whole laboriously explained, especially in the coneither to Christ and his benefits, or to anti-troversial works against the Nestorians, Christ and his wars and desolations, and to Eutychians, Pelagians, and Arians. the kindred subjects.

5. Here and there, however, one more sagacious and wiser than the rest ventured to point out a safer path. This is evident from the Epistles of Isidore of Pelusium, who in various places censures in a pertinent manner those who, disregarding the historic sense, referred all the narrative and prophetic parts of the Old Testament to Christ; and yet he himself was by no means entirely free from the fault of his age, the love and pursuit of allegories. No one went further in censuring the imitators of Origen than Theodorus of Mopsuestia. He not only wrote a book concerning allegory and history against Origen,2 but also in his own Commentaries on the Prophets of the Old Testament he ventured to explain most of their predictions with reference to events in ancient history; and this method of explaining the Old Testament perhaps raised as much ill-will against him as those other Bentiments which brought on him the charge of heresy. The example of this excellent man was followed especially by the Nestorians. Nor have they yet ceased to follow

Concerning both, see Simon, Hist. des Princip. Comment. du Nour. Test. chap. xxi. p. 330, &c [For some account of Cyril, see note 3, p. 183, and concerning Isidore, note 1, p. 184 above.-Mur. [Further, in respect of three of these interpreters, Theodoret, Cyril, and Isidore, see Davidson's Sacred Hermeneutics from p. 141, &c.-R.

2 Facundus Hermianensis, De Tribus Capitulis, lib. iii. cap. vi; Liberatus, Breviarium, cap. xxiv.

3 Acta Concilii Constantinop. II. seu (Ecumenici V. tom. iii. p. 58 of Harduin's Concilia.

4 One witness among others is Cosmas Indicopleustes, a writer of the sixth century, who is known to have been a Nestorian. For he says in his Topographia, lib. v. (pages 224, 225, of the Collectio nova Patrum Græcor. published by Montfaucon), "Among all the Psalms of David only four refer to Christ;" and to confirm this sentiment he does not hesitate to declare (p. 227)

7. Of controversial writers a great number can be mentioned, and indeed many such were required by the numerous controversies. The worshippers of the pagan images and gods were vigorously assailed by Theodoret in his book De Curandis Græcorum Affectionibus, which displays much genius and erudition, by Orientius in his Commonitorium, and by Evagrius in his Disputation between Zachæus and Apollonius. To these may be added Philip of Side and Philostorgius, of whom the former wrote against Julian and the latter against Porphyry." The Jews were confuted by Basil of Seleucia, by Gregentius in his Disputation with Herbanus, and by Evagrius in his Dialogue between Theophilus and a Jew. Against all the heretics something was attempted by Voconius, an African,

8

"That the writers of the New Testament when they

See

apply the prophecies of the Old Testament to Jesus also Walch, Hist. der Ketzer, vol. p. p. 880.-Mur.

Christ, follow the words rather than the sense."

5 Gennadius, De Scriptoribus Ecclesiast. cap. xxii. p.

14, ed. Fabric. [The work is lost, but from the account of Gennadius it was no System of Theology.Mur. [See Professor Ramsay's account of the author

whose name was Nicetas or Nicas, in Smith's Dict. of Greek and Rom. Biog. vol. ii. p. 1184.-R.

6 For an account of Orientius and Evagrius see the Hist. Littér, de la France, tome ii, pages 121, and 252. [Orientius, called also Orontius and Öresius, was bishop of Aux in France, perhaps also of Tarragona in Spain His Commonitorium written in heroic verse, was pub lished, book i. by Delrio, Antwerp, 1600, and book ii. by Martene, in his Nova Collectio Onerum Eccles. Vet. Paris, 1700. This Evagrius is not the noted Evagrius Scholasticus of the sixth century, but was a French priest and a disciple of St. Martin. His Altercatic Simonis Judai et Theophili Christiani, is found in Martene's Anecdota; and his Consultationes, seu Deliberationes Zachai Christiani et Apollonii Philosophi, is in the Spicilegium of D'Achery, tom. x.-Schl.

7 Neither of the works here mentioned is extant.Mur.

For some account of this Basil and of his writings see note 2, p. 185 above.-Mur.

« הקודםהמשך »