תמונות בעמוד
PDF
ePub

commerce with all body ; so did he on the other hand again imagine, that they might also descend and sink down so low, as to animate not only the bodies of brutes, but even of trees and plants too: two inconsistent parádoxes; the latter whereof is a most prodigious extravagancy, which yet Empedocles, though otherwise a great wit, seems to have been guilty of also, from those verses of his in Athenæus ; *

הכא אין גיף ,aphorism of his

,
in his great work

[ocr errors]

"Ηδη γάς ποτ' εγώ γενόμην κούρη τε κόρος τε,

Θάμνος τ', οιωνός τε και είν αλί έλλοπος ιχθύς. And amongst the Jews, the famous Maimonides was also of this persuasion, it being a known

, Obryaw 77999 W: That in the world to come, or state of consummate happiness, there shall be nothing at all of body, but pure incorporeity: Upon which account, being accused as a denier of the resurrection, an article as well of the Jewish as of the Christian faith) he wrote that book entitled Iggereth Tenan, purposely to purge himself, and to reconcile those two assertions together, which he doth after such a manner, as that there should be indeed a resurrection, at the first coming of the Jewish Messias, of some .certain persons, to live here awhile upon the earth, eat and drink, marry and be given in marriage, and then die again ; after which, in the world to come, they should for ever continue pure souls, ununited to any body. In which it may be well suspected, that the design Maimonides drove at, was against Christianity; which, notwithstanding, as to this particular, bath the

[blocks in formation]

concurrent suffrages of the best philosophers, that the most genuine and perfect state of the human soul, which in its own nature is immortal, is to continue for ever, not without, but with a body; and yet our high-flown enthusiasts generally (however calling themselves Christians), are such great spiritualists, and so much for the inward resurrection, (which we deny not to be a Scripture notion also; as in that of St. Paul, *“ If ye be risen with Christ,” &c. And again, 6« If by any means I might attain to the resurrection of the dead,") as that they quite allegorize away, together with the other parts of Christianity, the outward resurrection of the body; and, indeed, will scarcely acknowledge any future immortality, or life to come, after death, their spirituality thus ending in Sadducism and infidelity, if not at length in downright Atheism and sensuality.

But, besides this, there is yet a further correspondence of Christianity with the forementioned philosophic cabala, in that the former also supposes the highest perfection of our human souls, not to consist in being eternally conjoined with such gross bodies as these we now have, unchanged and unaltered : for as the Pythagoreans and Platonists have always complained of these terrestrial bodies, as prisons, or living sepulchres of the soul; so does Christianity seem to ran much upon the same strain, in these Scripture expressions: ““ In this we groan earnestly, desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven:” and again, d« We that are in this tabernacle do groan, being burdened, not for that we would be unclothed (that is, stripped quite naked of all body), but so clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life;" and, lastly, &“Ourselves also, which have the first-fruits of the Spirit, groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption (sonship or inheritance), namely, the redemption of our bodies ;" that is, the freedom of them from all those evils and maladies of theirs, which we here lie oppressed under. Wherefore we cannot think, that the same heavy load and luggage, which the souls. of good men, being here burdened with, do so much groan to be delivered from, shall, at the general resurrection, be laid upon them again, and bound fast to thein, to all eternity : for, of such a resurrection as this, Plotinus(though perhaps mistaking it for the true Christian resurrection), might have some cause to affirm, that it would be but aváoTaoIÇ siç allov útvov, a resurrection to another sleep ;the soul seeming not to be thoroughly awake here, but, as it were, soporated with the dull steams and opiatic vapours of this gross body. For thus the author of the Book of Wisdom, b«The corruptible body presseth down the soul, and the earthly tabernacle weigheth down the mind, that museth upon 'many things.” But the same will further

a Col. ii. 1.
c 2 Cor. v. 2.

b Pbil. iii. 2.
d 2 Cor. v. 4.

appear, from that account, which the Scripture itself giveth us of the resurrection : and first, in general, when St. Paul, answering that query of the philosophic infidel, “How are the dead raised, or with what body do they come?" replieth in this manner, “Thou fool (that is, thou who thinkest to puzzle or baffle the Christian article of the resurrection, which thou understandeșt not), that which thou sowest is not quickened (to the production of any

a Rom, viii. 23..

b

Chap. ix. 15.

[ocr errors]

thing), except it first die to what it was.” And thou sowest not that body that shall be, but bare grain," as of wheat, or of barley, or the like; but God (in the ordinary course of nature), giveth it a body, as it hath pleased him (that is, a stalk, and an ear, having many grains with husks in it, and therefore neither in quantity nor quality the same with that, which was sowed under ground), nor does he give to all seeds one and the same kind of body neither, but to every seed its own correspondent body, as to wheat one kind of ear, and to barley another. As if he should have said: Know that this present body of ours is to be looked upon but as a kind of seed of the resurrection-body, wbich therefore is accordingly in some sense the same, and in some sense not the same with it. Besides which general account, the particular oppositions, which the Scripture makes betwixt the present and future body, seem very agreeable to those of the philosophic cabala: for, first, the present body is said to besowed “in corruption,” but the future “raised in incorruption.” For the children of the resurrection cannot die any more. And then “mortality shall be swallowed up of life.”c Wherefore the Christian resurrection-body, as well as that of the philosophic. cabala, is owua álávatov, and aidov too, (2 Cor. v. 1.) an immortal and eternal body. Again, the body sowed is said to be a dishonourable, ignominious, and inglorious body; and therefore called also by St. Paul, το σώμα της ταπεινώσεως ημών, the body of our humility, or humiliation ;-a body agreeable to this lapsed state of the soul, but the body, which

[blocks in formation]

6 Luke xx. 36.

d 1 Cor. xv, 43, e Phil. üi, 21.

[ocr errors]

shall be raised, shall be a glorious body; and sýu-
μορφον τω σώματι της δόξης αυτού, « conformable to that
glorious body of Christ;" who, when but external-
ly transfigured, his face“ did shine as the sun," and
his "raiment was white as the light.” The glory of
a body consisteth only in the comeliness of its pro-
portion, and the splendour thereof: thus is there
“one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon,
and another glory of the stars;" that is, a different
splendour of them. Wherefore the future body of
the righteous, according to the Scripture also, as
well as the philosophic cabala, will be owia pwtel-
νον, and.σωμα αυγοειδές, and σώμα άστροειδές, a glorious,
splendid, luciform, and star-like body:-(Wisdom
iii. 7.) εν καιρώ επισκοπής αυτών εκλάμψoυσι, “The right-
eous, in the time of their visitation, shall shine
forth.”—(Dan. xii. 2,3.) “ They, that be wise, shall
shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they,
that turn 'many to righteousness, as the stars for
ever and ever.” And (Matt. xiii. 43.) “Then shall
the righteous shine forth as thesunin the kingdom of
their Father.” And therefore probably this future
glorious resurrection-body is that inheritance of
the saints in light," which the Scripture speaks of,
Col. i. 12. Moreover, there is another difference
betwixt this present and that 'future body of
the righteous, wherein St. Paul and Hierocles do
well agree; the first being called by both of them
owójta fugikov, “an animal body"-the second owua
TTVEVMarikov, “a spiritual body."—Which latter ex-
pression, in Scripture, not only denotes the sub-
tilty and tenuity thereof; but also as this present
body is called an “animal body," because it is suit-

a 1. Cor. xv. 41.

bi Cor. xv. 44. • Comment. in aurea Pythag. carmina, p. 214. edit. Needhami,

« הקודםהמשך »