eight more. The last five were communicated to Cafaubon from the Palatine library at Heidelberg. • Permit me to obferve in this place, that our Author's imperfec tions feem rather owing to accidental circumftances, than to any defect in his own tafte or judgment. One fault however we muit not conceal, namely, an indelicacy and coarfenefs of ideas and expreffions, which to a modern reader would feem quite inexcufable. I shall not enquire with Dr. Gally, whether the delicacy of the prefent age does not proceed from an affected nicety, or a falfe taste, rather than the intrinfic nature of things; but only obferve, from the general character we have seen our Author bear for elegance, and a punctilious obfervance of decorum, that this fault was rather in the age, than in the man. Cafaubon argues, from his frequent mention of vociferation, that he had tender ears; and indeed every inftance of impropriety, which he produces, conveys at the fame time a fufficient evidence of his own difapprobation of it. From what has been faid, the reader will have a competent idea of the difficulties which have attended the prefent work. To reconcile it to modern notions, to make the confufed characters confiftent, and to keep up a diftinction between the very fimilar ones, was a work of no fmall attention. I have not, however, taken fo great a liberty with the original, as to attempt a reduction of the feemingly misplaced inftances; nor are any of them totally omitted, though fome perhaps might have been fpared. Shall it be owned, that two or three whole characters were for fome time rejected, as incapable of being fuccefsfully handled, either on account of their obfcurity or coarfeness of manners? By the advice however of an excellent critic, in order to render the work complete, they have been new modelled and retained, without difgrace, it is hoped, to their fellows. The learned reader will perceive, that new introductions are fubftituted in the room of the dry Ariftotelian definitions which are prefixed to all the original pieces. Many inftances are tranfpofed in the fame character, for the fake either of perfpicuity, or a better conclufion, or for fome other inferior reason. The word Imitations, in the title, is adopted, it must be owned, for want of a better, though the following ketches might almoft pafs for originals, fo total a change has been fometimes made, efpecially in the Sixteenth Character, where the nature of the fubject required it; and fo much new matter introduced, especially in the Third, where incoherence is the characteristic. If either the language or ideas in the following fheets fhould feem to fall below the ftandard of modern refinement, it is hoped, that the nature of the perfons here introduced will apologise for the want of an extreme attention to a taste which, however laudable in itself, it may not always perhaps be poffible to comply with. It is requefied too, that if any thing fhould feem awkward or unneceffary, the Reader would not pafs an unfavourable judgment without first referring to the original paffage. The manners in the original are certainly general, and confequently, it was apprehended, might appear with advantage at any other period, Our Clown, for inftance, is not exclufively the produce of this or that particular country, but only one who is removed from from fociety, and deftitute of all politeness; nor is our Courtier the attendant upon this or any other court, but a general favour-hunter (Apoxos): he is, in fhort, as the poet fings, "The courtier fmooth, who forty years had fhin'd "An humble fervant to all human kind." The fame might be faid of the other characters. As to the customs indeed, which are widely different from the manners, as they refer to the exterior, and not interior conduct, thefe muft neceffarily have been local and particular; they are now therefore, in course, adapted to the age and nation to which they are at prefent addreffed. Meffrs. Colman and Thornton did well in not attempting to modernife, or generalife, their authors. The laws of the drama would not have admitted fuch violence; nor could they have got rid of the customs upon which each plot, and perhaps every scene, is founded. Mr. Colman therefore fhould have faid, that the customs, and not the manners, prevailing in them all, are wholly Grecian. Manners, as Mr. Thornton acknowledges, will ever bé much alike, at leaft in civilized nations. A great part of the following fheets have lain by, even a longer time than is prefcribed by the great critic; as appears indeed by fome names and circumstances which occur, though feveral others of later fame have occafionally crept in during the revisals they have from time to time undergone. Such as they are, I shall submit them to the candour of the Public, and conclude with the Proem prefixed by the author himself to the original work, and addreffed to a friend of his, named Polycles.' Then follows the Proem of Theophraftus, well worthy of attention : PROEM OF THEOPHRASTUS. 'I have often wondered, when I confidered the fubject, and perhaps fhall never ceafe to wonder, how it happens, that fince we all partake of the fame air, and make ufe of the fame fyftem of education, we should nevertheless have fuch a diversity of manners. For my part, Polycles, having long ftudied human nature, being now ninetynine † years old, and having been converfant with many different people, among whom I have narrowly examined both the good and the bad, it seemed a duty incumbent on me, to give an accurate defcription of their different purfuits; for which purpose I shall carefully point out to you their respective peculiarities both of temper and conduct, FOR I AM OF OPINION, MY DEAR POLYCLES, THAT OUR POSTERITY WILL BE BENEFITED BY HAVING SUCH EXAMPLES TO REFER TO. THESE CHARACTERS WILL ENABLE THEM TO DIS. CERN AND ATTACH THEMSELVES TO THE WORTHIEST, SO AS IN THE END NOT TO BE INFERIOR TO THEM. Let us now proceed to the work before us, and let me befpeak your attention, and opinion The original fays all Greece, but it seems to mean Attica, or at moft Græcia propria.' + There must certainly be fome mistake here, which is by no means accounted for by the critics; for Cafaubon's conjecture, that might have crept into the text inftead of 66', would make him an hundred and nine. how as /pecimens, how far I have fucceeded. Without further preface, or circumlocution, I fhall begin with that fort of men called Dissemblers. I fhall define the Paffion, and then proceed to defcribe the Diffembler, what kind of man he is, and by what particular bias he is actuated. In like manner I fhall endeavour to explain and particularife the other characters, as I originally propofed.' Of the manner in which these Imitations are executed, we fhall give only two CHARACTERS: THE PRATE R. • The Prater would outprove by far Should you refume it-Hold, fays he, And fend amongst 'em fuch a volly And make fo great a noife and hubbub, That they're oblig'd to break their club up. Intrudes upon a public school, Greek, Latin, Hebrew, quit the field; All other tongues to his muft yield; He He talks the masters all away, Of FRED'RICK, FERDINAND, and GRANBY; A long elaborate oration, You, as a connoiffeur, and lover For that fame vulgar herd, he'll fwear it, In gen❜ral most of those whose fate For laugh, and call him what you will, When his own children, from pure nature, Lifp out, as up his knees they creep, Papa, do-ftory us to fleep.' THE VULGAR WA G. For The Vulgar Wag our fpleen provokes, The scavenger of vulgar jokes ; For decent companies unfit, And fwears, when he perceives her blushing, Half a ftreet's length, with, Hark ye, Jack. He's ready to congratulate; Or, out of fun, he'll lead a stranger Sometimes, as through the streets he reels, Should |