תמונות בעמוד
PDF
ePub

Plant," by Shelley; "The Eve of St. Agnes," by Keats; "Paradise and the Peri," by Thomas Moore; "The Raven," by Poe; "The Skeleton in Armor," by Longfellow; "The Haunted House," by Hood; "The Writing on the Image," by William Morris; "Tam O'Shanter," by Burns; "The Forging of the Anchor," by Samuel Ferguson; "Morte d'Arthur," by Tennyson; and Macaulay's "Horatius." Now, it is plain that, while no exception can be taken to any one of these poems, the book, as a collection, would find it difficult to give a raison d'être. Not only does it not contain all, or nearly all, the narrative poems in the language that can fairly be called classic, but it is not even representative; there are scores of such poems omitted which are as good as any except the very best of those included and better than most of them. The collection simply gathers in one volume a number of poems with which every one is familiar, and which may be found in all previous compilations. Mr. Johnson cannot but be aware of its deficiencies. His prose selections filled the twelve volumes to which the series was originally limited, and it would have been wiser, we think, had it ended there.

Is a novel by Julia Kavanagh one is reasonably sure to find a coherent and probable plot, incidents which are interesting without being sensational in the slightest degree, characters that resemble real persons sufficiently to awaken a sort of personal interest in them, and a fluent and agreeable if somewhat monotonous style. The reader, moreover, is always treated with perfect good faith. Having made up her mind what her story is to be, Miss Kavanagh tells it with straightforward directness; never introduces stimulating episodes merely to prop up an interest which the story itself cannot sustain; and when she has any preaching or moralizing to introduce, does not do it under the guise of ordinary conversation, but writes it down in solid paragraphs that almost challenge the reader to skip them. Of all these qualities, "John Dorrien," her latest story, is a good example. It is well constructed, well told, has an admirable hero, a pretty and pleasant heroine, a mildly-wicked villain, minor dramatis persona who contrast with cach other excellently, and maintains its interest through some five hundred pages of liberal dimensions. Its chief fault is a lack of local coloring, which, as the scene is laid in France, and as Miss Kavanagh has a keen sense of the picturesque and a cultivated faculty of observation, is rather surprising. Much more could have been made of the Saint- Ives school and of the life of the English colony in Paris; but then, as we have said, the author has too entire faith in her story to care much for subordinate matters. (D. Appleton & Co.)

“OLDBURY," by Anne Keary, which appears in the light, summer costume of the "International Series of New and Approved Novels " (New York: Porter & Coates), is one of those stories in which it is difficult to find any thing on which to base even a descriptive criticism. To summarize the plot would be simply to recall to the mind of the veteran

novel-reader reminiscences of dozens of other stories in which substantially the same framework is employed; while to dissociate the characters from the special parts which they play in the narrative would expose them to the suspicion of being names and nothing besides. It does not even furnish us with a decent excuse for a digression of our own, and we are reduced to saying briefly that “Oldbury" is a quiet, rather commonplace, and tolerably well-written story, in the perusal of which the leisurely reader can manage to consume several days, for it fills a stout and closely-printed duodecimo.

66

MR. FARJEON's new story, "Love's Victory," furnishes the Spectator with text for a brief discourse on the distinction between the novel and melodrama. "An utterly preposterous story," it says, may make an effective melodrama, and Mr. Farjeon would have done well to offer his manuscript to some stage-manager. Fine sentiments, an exciting mystery, a prosperous villain to be unmasked, a handsome, ingenuous youth to be established in his rights, lovely innocence to be protected and transferred from heart-wrung agony to a heaven of bliss, an aged father to be cleared from dishonor before he dies, with a noble cynic to laugh Ha, ha!' at the shams of the great world, and a good-humored buffoon to rush about and grin as cheerfully at the kicks as the half-pence, these are all the materials we require, and all these we have, for a highly-edifying drama that sends the gallery and pit, and not seldom the stalls and boxes as well, home to bed with a feeling of personal elevation, and with a sense of having had a hand in the noble deeds that have been enacted before them. All that we care about in melodrama is that principles shall be high and incident exciting, and that right shall triumph over might in the end. And if the sentiment be somewhat high-flown, and the characters leaning toward the angelic and the diabolic, and the circumstances tending toward the sensational, then, so much the more clearly to the popular mind, and in so much the bolder relief, will stand out the purpose of the piece that vice should suffer and virtue rejoice. Melodrama is all the better melodrama for containing a lively and even exaggerated illustration of the beauty and claims of goodness, and of the deformity and deserts of wickedness. But a story should be a natural picture of real life and of individual, not merely typical, character, and not a series of startling positions and striking scenes, which give persons of fine sentiments a succession of opportunities for airing their views and exercising their generosity, and afford modest loveliness fit occasions for recounting its struggles of agony and its triumphs of conscience."

THE Spectator thinks very highly of the "Songs of Two Worlds," the third series of which was published lately in London. It says: "Criticism is a dim and groping art at best, but in the present case it is even more dull and groping than usual, if we are mistaken in supposing that the man who wrote those stanzas ought to have in him what will give him a permanent, though probably a modest, place in the line of English poets. We do not say he has won it yet. These three volumes, though full of reflective beauty, and containing one or two passages of stately and statuesque power, might not produce a sufficient body of verse, in an age when slight impressions so easily pass away, for such a re- !

sult. But our author has, we cannot doubt, proved his capacity to shape conceptions which will lay a strong hold of our minds, and to embody them in a music which will not easily die out of our hearts." . . . Objections having been made by some of the persons mentioned in the letters, the publication of Mr. Mill's correspondence with Comte has been postponed for the present. . . . Mr. Tennyson is said to derive an income of fifteen to twenty thousand dollars a year from composers who set his songs to music. The charge for permission to set a poem is twenty-five dollars, and the applications average three a day. . . . The London Times says that Mr. Tennyson's "Queen Mary" gives evidence of more fire than any thing that has appeared since Shakespeare's time. Mr. Joseph Hatton is writing for London Society "The True History of Punch," in which will appear hitherto unpublished letters of Thackeray, Dickens, Shirley Brooks, Mayhew, and Tom Hood. . . . The Academy describes Mr. Henry James's "A Passionate Pilgrim and Other Stories" as "a series of careful studies in Nathaniel Hawthorne's manner. This is not one

[ocr errors]

of those cases of unconscious influence, common with young writers who reproduce imperfect echoes of authors who have touched their imagination and lingered in their memory, and who believe themselves original in so doing. Mr. James, on the contrary, is fully aware of what he does, and has set himself at Hawthorne's feet with the entire trust and admiration which we may suppose to have been exhibited formerly by the pupils in the school of a great and original painter. He has his reward, too, for he has caught much more than the mere trick of style, by no means difficult to imitate, and has succeeded more nearly than any other writer we have met in entering into Hawthorne's psychology, with its half-morbid and entirely weird conception of life." . . . M. Charles de Rémusat, the French littérateur and politician, who died recently, is described by one of his friends as "in every thing the first of amateurs." . . . The original manuscript of Gray's "Elegy written in a Country Churchyard" was sold the other day in London. It is entirely in the autograph of the poet, and contains alterations, erasures, and corrections, which show the anxious care bestowed upon its composition. In this manuscript, the names of "Cæsar" and " Tully are erased, and those of" Cromwell" and "Milton" substituted. . . . The Saturday Review, in its notice of Carlyle's "Early Kings of Norway," assails the style in this fashion: "Mr. Carlyle and his admirers no doubt think it clever to talk about Bluetooth & Co.'s invasions,' 'Svein, Eric & Co.,' 'the viking public,' and so forth. They perhaps think it both learned and clever to call the Eastern emperors 'poor kaisers,' without which touch we could have given Mr. Carlyle credit for understanding German, and we should not have been tempted to guess that he fancies that German was spoken at Constantinople. They perhaps think that there is some point in trampling grammar under foot, in beginning sentences with verbs without nominative cases, or with nominative cases queerer than none at all. 'Can think of no safe place;' old mistress does receive him;' had a standing army.' Even when Mr. Carlyle wishes to give his opinion as to a date, his way of doing so is to say, 'Guess somewhere about 1040.' About things of this kind it is no use arguing: those who like them will go on liking them; those who have a respect for history or for any other serious study will go on feeling a twinge when they see it thus dressed up in motley "

W

The Arts.

ITHIN two or three weeks there has been a very large and important exhibition in Boston of drawings from the public schools of the State. This collection, which numbered several thousand specimens, comprised a wide range of subjects, including geometrical drawings, designs for lace, calico, china, architectural plans, and problems in perspective. The work was done by pupils six years old and upward. Massachusetts, as is well known, took the initiative of introducing drawing into the common schools some four or five years ago, since which time there have been yearly exhibitions, each of which has been superior to the previous ones.

It is known by persons competent to judge that the peculiar genius of different nations gives a marked character to their art; and never perhaps so well have the temperament and sensibilities of Americans had so distinct an expression as in these little drawings made by thousands of Massachusetts children uninfluenced by traditions or preconceived ideas. Copied from natural objects, or designed on general geometrical principles, many of them seemed to us full of the nervous sensibility peculiar to the American character.

The general system of instruction in drawing is that pursued in the English schools, but in its application, outside of some leading and axiomatic propositions, the mind of every child is allowed, within the scope of these positive points, to work in perfect freedom. Among the designs, those which seemed to us distinctively American were the patterns for calicoes and wall-papers, and also for china. Uniting the unpretending, honest thought that characterizes so strongly the South Kensington School, the Minton china, and, in fact, all the good new English designs, some of the pictures in this exhibition had a delicate quality both in form and color quite unlike the solid and somewhat clumsy decoration of England. One design we recollect in particular, from a country school, that was based, we believe, on a hepotica, or wild-geranium—a semi-transparent flower, whose delicate petals possess in nature an almost gossamer-like fragility. The design was developed on the most rigid principles of botanical analysis, and in it were indicated, with the precision that marks every English pattern, the character of the green leaves, the peculiarities of stem and flowerstalk, and these, too, with the excellent English absence of unmeaning flourish or ornament; but more, we think, than the English or French character would appreciate, as a chief and distinctive attraction, the filmy, gossamer-like beauty of the petals and their lovely curves were dwelt upon, and so lovingly emphasized, that we could not doubt the motive that had prompted the selection of this flower.

Without the testimony of our own eyes, we could hardly have believed that under any system of teaching children six years old could have produced little designs of their

own so precise, pretty in proportion and in general form, as were some of these drawings made from dictation-lessons. But a few precise and rigid directions were given in the class, and these the children were bound to follow, and, after these instructions had been carried out, every little creature who is fond of wreathing flowers in its hat, or arranging stones or buttercups in pleasant forms on the grass, had but to put the same amount of fancy upon the plan that was geometrically laid down of squares, or ovals, or composed❘ circles, and a pleasant picture was almost certain to be the result.

THE recent death of the French artist Millet has given an added interest to his pictures, so that the exhibition of one of the most famous of them, "The Sower," in the Loan Collection in Boston, has been made the subject of much comment in art circles.

This picture is somewhat known from engravings, but, like the large proportion of works of art, it is only the original that embodies its own especial peculiarity. Hung near the picture by Paul Veronese, of which we had occasion to speak two or three weeks ago, the merits of this representative of a new school, and a masterpiece by a great leader of Italian art, have provoked a good deal of criticism and many comparisons. Painted in an age when subjective literature and the most subtile analysis of human motives form the chief staple for the reading world in the dissection of character by George Eliot, George Sand, Balzac, and Kingsley, "The Sower," by Millet, is yet the most subjective picture we ever saw.

and simple, and the expression of melancholy and strength entirely exempts it from any thing conventional or melodramatic. The beholder never thinks of the man as a posed figure, and the grand, simple repetition of lines through the composition is appreciated as solemnity and force, and not as a pedantic exhibition of the resources of the artist.

It is a good thing to be able at a glance to study two pictures and two standards of thought so diverse as this Millet and the Veronese; each seems to make the epoch of the other more distinct and appreciable. Comparing the two, it appears to us that no technical artist can resist the impression of the purity and perfection of the conditions that made such a painting possible as "The Marriage of St. Catherine." Beside the wild, impassioned, and withal somewhat muddily-colored and raggedly - lined picture of "The Sower," it hangs in its perfection of parts and delicacy of line and color, in its balance of light and shade, as complete and harmonious as a lily on its stalk, or an antique statue on its pedestal.

ALTHOUGH a great many monuments have been erected or completed in Germany since the last war with France, only one of themthe Hermann Monument, in the Teutoburger Forest-has, in every respect, a truly national character, and this commemorates an event which happened nearly nineteen hundred years ago. Now, however, the whole German nation has become deeply interested in the project of erecting a monument which shall stand as a memorial of the greatest epoch in modern German history-the union of the race against the French, and the formation of a new empire under Kaiser Wilhelm. It is to be placed upon the Niederwald, a lofty summit at the extremity of the Taunus Mountains, overlooking the Rhine. From this point there is a magnificent view, not only of the beautiful, vine-covered province known as the Rheingau, but also of the country on both sides of the river for many miles around. The monument will be distinctly visible for an immense distance.

The idea of constructing such a monument was first entertained very soon after the accession of the King of Prussia to the imperial throne. It was taken up with ardor among all classes of the people in every part of the empire, and preparations were quickly made for obtaining a suitable design. A large number of designs were submitted to the com

Strong as an athlete, the heavy-jointed, dark limbs of the Sower swing along as he moves down an open furrow of the field. His joints are big as those of a cart-horse, and the peasant-coarseness of the paintings by Courbet is mingled with the proud and thoughtful composition of his form. The upper part of his face is concealed by shadow, and his coarse lips and nose and jaw, resolute and sad, over which the daylight is playing, are the active power in a life whose spirit is delineated by the artist as in an eclipse analogous to that which conceals his eyes and forehead. A pouch of grain hangs round his waist, and from it he flings broadcast corn into the open earth, while behind him, and corresponding to the lower qualities of his nature which are stamped in the lines of his heavy mouth and jaw, "the fowls of the air" stoop to devour the ill-planted grain.mittee of judges by many noted German artFar off above him, in an upland meadow over which the sunlight is brooding, a man with his oxen is driving a plough. If the career of Jean Valjean, in Victor Hugo's “Misérables," | be fateful and hopeless, this picture of "The Sower" might be a fitting likeness of that strange character struggling against a nature whose good impulses seemed predestined to defeat; or to show in paint a man as entangled in the meshes of his own inherited proclivities as the fly in the spider's web in that most melancholy portrait of life in Hugo's "Notre-Dame."

Considered as a composition in paint, this work has many fine points. The swing and action of the figure of the Sower are free

ists, but the one offered by Professor Johannes Schilling, of Dresden, was unanimously declared to be the most appropriate and meritorious.

This symbol of German unity will prob-. ably be about ninety feet high, and not less than sixty in width at the base. The dimensions, however, have not yet been given with exactness. It will be constructed of differently-colored granite, with figures of bronze. To the right and left of the socle, or broad, projecting lower pedestal, which will form the centre of the base, there will be terraced walls surmounted at each end by a colossal bronze candelabrum. In the middle of this socle there will be a sculptured group, repre

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

senting the Rhine and the Moselle. Next will come the upper pedestal, which will be elaborately ornamented and inscribed. In front will be displayed a large group, typi fying the uprising of the German people to defend the Rhine, and containing a number of warlike figures surrounding the Emperor William, who will be mounted and in military attire. Beneath this group will be inscribed five verses of the popular patriotic song, "Die Wacht am Rhein." On the three other sides of this pedestal lengthy inscriptions will set forth, in general terms, the history of the war with France, and the reëstablishment of the German Empire. To the left there will stand a huge figure of War, holding a drawn sword, and sounding the alarm through a great trumpet; and on the right will be an image of Peace, corresponding in size to the other, crowned with laurel, and holding an olive-branch in her hand. Between these two figures will rise the shaft of the monument. Its lower portion will be adorned in front with the German eagle, garlands of victory, and shields containing the arms of the different states composing the empire; while at the sides, and in the rear, will be presented the names of those most active in bringing about the new order of things, including all the principal German generals of the present day. The whole will be surmounted by a magnificent colossal figure of Germany, standing before the imperial throne. The artist seems to have exerted all his power upon this grand statue, and his conception is well worthy of the universal admiration it has excited among his countrymen. The figure is that of a beautiful young woman, thoroughly German in aspect, holding up with one bare, splendidly-shaped arm the crown of the empire, while the other rests upon the hilt of a long, laurel-wreathed sword, whose point is beside her right foot.

How soon the monument will be completed cannot now be stated. But the people in ev. ery part of the empire seem to be working earnestly for the accomplishment of that end. Contributions of money are flowing in rapidly from various sources, and a large amount is already in the possession of the committee.

66 we

PORTRAITS on a huge scale are always a striking if not a pleasing feature of the Royal Academy exhibitions. Blackwood, in an artiele on this year's exhibition, has the following pungent passage upon a production of this kind: "Talking of portraits," it says, cannot refrain from lifting up our testimony against the greatest crime in this way which has been perpetrated upon an unoffending public for years. Many and great are the offenses which we put up with, grumbling yet patient, from exhibition to exhibition; but there is enough in this to warrant a popular rising. The picture in the second room, by Mr. Wells, marked 112 (we would not be so rude as to name any names), reaches the point at which portrait-painting ceases to be an offense and becomes a crime. Mr. Wells has done and can do very good work, and it is surely an act of very ill-intentioned favor to him which has induced the hanging committee to sanction such an exhibition. Two ladies more than life-size under the big portico of a house, about half a dozen men equally colossal on horseback, and attended by a world

of dogs, fill up the whole side of the room, and look haughtily at the unfortunate spectators as if challenging their right to look. Heaven knows how little desire we have to look! The picture is simply insupportable; it had no right to be painted, and, being painted, it has no right to be exhibited. If artists and their sitters choose to display the vulgar absurdity of which they can be guilty, let them find a picture-gallery for themselves in which to exhibit their joint performance; but we protest against the sacrifice of any of our national walls for such a purpose. Has the Academy no shame for itself, no thought of what its neighbors will say, that wholesome dread which so often keeps us from folly? We have suffered long from big portraits, but this is the climax of all. Is it because it is

like the family piece of Dr. Primrose's household, too big to be put anywhere else, that it has been foisted upon the Academy? Such an exhibition is nothing less than high-treason against English art."

THE Overland Monthly, speaking of Keith's "High Sierra," now on exhibition in San Francisco, declares that "it fully justifies in its perfect state the enthusiasm it called up, when but half done, in the mind of such a masterful judge of mountain-scenery as John Muir. It reproduces the hoary giant mountains back of the Yosemite Valley near the head-waters of the Merced River-reproduces them not alone with an accuracy of detail satisfactory to a geologist, but also with that grander artistic effect so extolled by Ruskin, that power of calling up in the soul of the spectator the same spirit and impressions that the original of the picture would evoke. The mountains loom in the distance through that indefinable purplish haze, so hard to reproduce that not one artist in hundreds can catch or fix it, yet here so faithfully colored that J. W. Gally, standing with us before the picture, cried out in delight: 'He has it! This man has more water in his

puddle than the rest of them. This picture was never painted in a studio.' No; there is no close air about it. On the mountain-side, in the very face of Nature, seeing her eye to eye, was this canvas covered with its colors. You feel the chill wind from the gray, unmelted snow, you hear the creaking of the glaciers as they grind their way through the hollow cañons, you hear the incessant voice of the water as it falls and feathers along its rocky channels. There is a poet here as well as a painter, and from storm-beaten pine to cloven rock, from water naked in the light to where it sheathes itself in the heart of darkness, he sees, and knows, and loves. Not, of course, a poet without discords, not a painter without flaws, but, best taken with worst, a great and sympathetic artist.”

Correspondence.

To the Editor of Appletons' Journal.

DEAR SIR: Permit me the use of your columns to suggest what should be done with the crumbs, so to speak, of the Centennial Exhibition.

Baron Schwarz-Senborn, the emeritus director of the Vienna Exhibition, and Austrian minister plenipotentiary to our country, picked up the leavings of the great industrial feast, and gathered enough to found a great Industrial Museum and Working-man's Free Training-School, like the Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers in Paris, or the Musée de l'Industrie in Brussels. We also should think a little of

the needs of the working-classes, and do something for the education of the masses. The poor boy spends a few months every year in some public school, and gets a general idea of reading, writing, and arithmetic, and then he goes and learns a trade, and learns of it only what his boss can and will teach him. In two or three of our largest cities he may go in the evening to some Cooper Institute and be instructed in rudimentary sciences, which by an early enforcement of the act of compulsory school-attendance he might have mastered long ago. He may find there also an opportunity to practise a little drawing, and to listen now and then to a lecture, which is usually high above his capacity, and far removed from his practical needs. But there is not one city in the Union that has an institution which is a genuine help to the working-man. What he wants is to learn to do his work well. The sort of thing which is called "a wide and higher culture" is of no immediate concern to him. Teach him how to distinguish between good and bad material, show him what the best tools are in his trade, let him examine some fine specimens of workmanship in his own line, and you render him a service. His own hands and eyes are the working-man's only successful teachers. Now, in SchwarzSenborn's Athenæum in Vienna, as in many other German, Belgian, French, and English sister institutions, he is surrounded by vast collections of home and foreign raw products, manufactured wares in various stages of completion, models, designs, apparatus, scaffoldings, tools, and machinery of every sort and description. There is a room full of patterns; there is a laboratory where he himself can make any technical and chemical experiment he likes; there are shops supplied with all manner of tools and appliances in which he may attempt to execute and test whatever he invents or others have invented; and there are theoretical and practical scientists of fame, walking through the various departments during the evening hours, to give every man just the information and counsel he needs, simply for the asking. This is the special feature of the Vienna institution, and it is not surprising that it has proved a great attraction. Free reading-rooms, courses of popular lectures, and rudimentary instruction, achieve some good, and form of course also part of the advantages offered by the Athenæum, but the permanent exhibition of industrial objects, the free use of shops and laboratories, and the opportunity of meeting men of experience and learning to get the right hint wherever wanted, have been the means of drawing hundreds of middle-aged journeymen and even the master-workmen out of their rum and beer haunts to spend their evenings, in every sense of the word, in the pursuit of knowledge.

It was a comparatively easy matter for Baron Schwarz-Senborn to found this Industrial Museum and Working-man's School, and it will be an equally easy thing for us to call one into existence here. Let a body be organized by the Legislature as the National Museum of Industry, and urge every exhibitor at the centennial to leave behind in Philadelphia, as a bequest to this museum, whatever generosity prompts him, or whatever he considers hardly worth while for him to remove. The result will be more than an ordinary house full of raw stuffs, models, designs, manufactures, machinery, tools, and the like. To get a suitable edifice either in this city or Philadelphia will not be difficult in our country, where liberality is almost a virtue in excess. Anyhow, the first to consider in establishing a museum is to have something to exhibit, and not, as

has been the case in many instances, to obtain a place of exhibition before there is any thing to show. The other details of such an institution, as the procuring of suitable men to give the practical instruction we have spoken of, and the providing of sufficient funds to meet the current expenses, will also obtain in time whatever is necessary for their execution. It is now two years since Baron Schwarz-Senborn set to work at his scheme of raising the intellectual condition of the working-classes in his own country, and his Athenæum, the only monument of the Vienna Exhibition still standing, is now quite prosperous and efficient. Yours respectfully,

THE

G. A. F. VAN RHYN.

From Abroad.

OUR PARIS LETTER.

gloves were of Bruges lace of the yellowishwhite tint then fashionable, but so finely worked that her delicate skin only appeared the more rosy beneath it." Thus attired, the tender and fragile loveliness of this flesh-andblood Ophelia, this anticipation in a court of Goethe's bourgeoise Gretchen, must have appeared even more charming than usual. Fouquet had already had the audacity to lay his heart and twenty thousand pistoles at the feet of this gentlest and sweetest of erring women, and had received an indignant repulse, notwithstanding which he was weak and wicked enough to place her portrait among those of his acknowledged conquests in a private cabinet at Vaux. He also took advantage of her presence at the fete to approach her anew with an avowal of his unwelcome passion, a circumstance which the lady at once revealed to her royal lover. Some one, thinking to injure La Vallière in the estimation of Louis, had already informed him of the presence of her portrait in the private cabinet, and from that hour the downfall of Fouquet was resolved upon.

From the family of Villars the palace passed into the possession of the Count de Choiseul-Praslin, cousin to the celebrated Duc de Choiseul, minister to Louis XV. By Madame de Pompadour's influence, the count was created a duke under the title of Duc de Pras

teen.

the title of Vaux-Praslin, and it has remained in possession of that family up to the present time. Hither, in 1825, the young Marquis de Praslin brought his bride, Fanny Sebastiani, the daughter of Marshal Sebastiani, to pass the honey-moon, the bridegroom being but twenty-one years of age and the bride eighA mutual affection presided at this union, and it was destined to be still further cemented by the birth of numerous offspring. Twenty-two years later the wife, then the Duchesse de Praslin, was murdered by her husband under circumstances of peculiar horror -not, however, at Vaux-Praslin, but in the Paris residence of the family on the ChampsElysées. Tradition still preserves many anecdotes of the good and charitable deeds of the unfortunate lady, who was the earthly providence of all the poor people dwelling around the château whenever she came to take up her residence there.

HE celebrated historical Château of VauxPraslin is to be offered at public sale on the 6th of July. It was built in the reign of Louis XIV. by the celebrated Fouquet. It originally cost eighteen million francs (three million six hundred thousand dollars), a sum which represents at least three times as much at the present time. Three villages were destroyed to form the site for the immense gar- | dens, laid out by Lenôtre, which were count-lin, the old château was rechristened anew by ed among the wonders of Europe. The fountains were the model of those afterward constructed at Versailles. The famous Lebrun had adorned the state-apartments with admirable pictures. St.-Germain and Fontainebleau, the chief country-seats which the kings of France then possessed (for Versailles and Marly were as yet undreamed of), could not compare in magnificence with Vaux-le-Vicomte, as this palace was then called. The fountains, in particular, then a novelty, became widely celebrated. They appear to have surpassed those of Versailles by their admirable arrangement, by which a full view of them could be obtained from the state-apartments of the chateau, every cascade, jet, and basin, forming part of an harmonious whole; while the royal fountains are scattered, and have to be viewed separately; they are, moreover, at a great distance from the palace, and invisible from it. No trace of these splendid water-works remains the basins and imagery are there, it is true, but the Duc de Villars, whose father purchased Vaux after the overthrow of Fouquet, caused the leaden pipes to be dug up and sold, finding the expense of keeping the works in order too great for his purse to endure. Some idea of their extent may be gained from the fact that the lead thus obtained brought the sum of over a million francs. It was here that Fouquet gave the celebrated fete to the young king and his court, which was the ultimate cause of his downfall. He had the temerity and the madness, though a married man, to fall in love with Mademoiselle de la Vallière, then in the full enjoyment of the fickle affections of Louis. The dress which she wore at this magnificent festival is thus described in the memoirs of the time: "Her robe was white, wrought with golden stars and leaves on Persian embroidery, and was kept in place by a pale-blue sash knotted below the bust. Her beautiful blond bair, flowing in wavy masses over her shoulders, was adorned with flowers and pearls, arranged in seeming carelessness, but without confusion. Two large emeralds sparkled in her ears. Her arins were bare, and to break their too fragile outline they were each surrounded above the elbow with a circlet of gold set with opals. Her

The family having fallen into poverty, the present duke resolved to mend his fortunes by marrying an heiress. A lovely American girl, the daughter of an immensely wealthy NewYorker, was selected by him for the doubtful honor of becoming Duchesse de Praslin, a title which had never been borne by any woman since the fatal night on which his mother had perished by his father's hand. The preliminary arrangements were wellnigh concluded, when in an evil hour the duke invited the object of his affections and her father to a lunch at Vaux-Praslin. The shrewd American came, saw, and investigated the huge pile of half- ruined buildings, and, finding that three hundred thousand dollars would be needed to put the château in thorough repair, and sixty thousand dollars per annum to keep it up and enable the young people to live in it, he very sensibly broke off the match. The duke afterward married an American lady, and it is said that the union is wholly one of affection. At all events, Vaux-Praslin is to be sold, as I said before, on the 6th of July. The estate is to be divided up into lots, and it is quite probable that the château itself will be torn down. The day for huge edifices and gigantic estates for the residence of private individuals in France has passed away.

The Figaro continues to publish extracts from the interesting and gossipy memoirs of the veteran actor Laferrière. One of the later chapters gives an account of the funeral of the great actress Marie Dorval, her who was the only rival really feared by Mademoiselle Mars when the latter was in the height of her career. Madame Dorval was the original Marion Delorme and Catarina of Victor Hugo's "Marion Delorme" and "Angelo," and she also created the heroines of several of the principal plays of the elder Dumas. She was the queen of the theatres of the Boulevard, as was Mademoiselle Mars of the Comédie Française. In her later days, though her talent was unimpaired, she lost her hold on the affections of the fickle Parisian public. Her last engagement was a total failure, and was canceled by the directors of the theatre at which she appeared (the Théâtre Historique) after the first three nights. This failure, and the death of a little grandchild to whom she was much attached, broke the poor actress's heart. She survived the blow but a short time, and the desertion which had attended her last appearance was not lacking at her funeral. Laferrière says: "Her hearse passed through the careless crowd followed only by a few faithful friends. I was of the number, as were also Alexandre Dumas, Victor Hugo, one or two of the sociétaires of the Comédie Française, a few authors, a few of her former comrades; and that was all. On the outer boulevard leading to the cemetery two men of the people stopped to look at the melancholy cortège. One said to the other:

"Why, that is Dorval's funeral.'

"It isn't possible,' remarked his comrade, 'there is nobody at it.'

"She had ceased to make money,' answered the other, shrugging his shoulders. And they went their ways. That speech came near being the only funeral oration of Dorval. When we were ranged around the grave, the grave-digger, after throwing in the first shovelful of earth, leaned on his spade and seemed to wait. A dead silence ensued, people looked at each other, but no one stirred. At last a young man, perceiving this singular abstention, came quickly forward, and, in a voice trembling with emotion, made a few remarks full of touching sympathy. That young man was Camille Doucet,* then a simple author. That was one of the many good actions of his life, which numbers so many. He has often been reproached for his skillful diplomacy, but I have never known any thing of him but his heart.

"As we were about to withdraw, a woman, supported by two servants, advanced to the brink of the yawning grave and gazed into it for some moments in mournful contemplation. That woman, enveloped in a black veil like Rodogune, and who bore on her majestic features the traces of a beauty once world-renowned, was Mademoiselle Georges. She said but two words, 'Poor woman!' But they were said in such a way that a unanimous sob broke from every breast. I have never heard any thing that was at once more simple and more grand."

Laferrière gives the following account of an interview which he once had with Victor Hugo. He thus begins his narrative:

"I quitted the company of the Porte St.Martin in the following manner: At the first reading of Marion Delorme,' a role of about ten lines had been allotted to me. Youth is

*Now a member of the French Academy and one of the leading dramatic authors of France. ! -(TR.)

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

ambitious; it wants ordinarily to do more than it can, and to do less seemed hard to me. Therefore I refused the ten lines.

Victor Hugo, being informed of my decision, invited me by letter to call upon him. I went to the Place Royale. The poet received me with his most majestic expression, and, without inviting me to sit down, demanded of me the reason of my refusal. This cold reception restored all my composure. Veiling, nevertheless, my resistance under a good deal of circumspection, I said to Victor Hugo:

"Your celebrity, sir, stimulates my ambition, and if I, an humble débutant, have permitted myself to refuse the supernumerary ride that was allotted to me, I hasten to solicit from you the part of the young Marquis de Saterway. There, at least, my ambition will find a noble field.'

[ocr errors]

But, however caressing my tone might be, it could not destroy the effect of that unlucky supernumerary' which had slipped from me unawares.

What, sir!' made answer the poet, in serious amazement, 'you have scarcely begun your career, and you already aspire to play the principal part in one of my works. That is impossible. As to the term of supernumerary,' which you have just made use of, know that ten lines by Victor Hugo are not to be refused, for they will endure.'

"And the poet touched the handle of the door. I withdrew.

"One hour afterward I had canceled my contract with the manager. I was free."

When a child, Laferrière was present at the debut of Mademoiselle Georges. Of her first and her last appearance on the French stage, he gives the following account:

'That evening, one Mademoiselle Georges Weimar was to play Roxana; the emotion in the audience was great. The evening previous Duchesnois had played the part, and the publie, which always enjoys the spectacle of theatrical rivalries, disputed already respecting the relative superiority of the two actresses. The curtain rose.

How beautiful she is!' was the unanimous cry of the entire audience. No one thought of either analyzing or disputing her talent; she was accepted in her youth, in her beauty, and in that splendor which was like a canticle of triumphant Nature. Like Phryne, she had conquered her judges merely by showing herself.

"Duchesnois was forgotten.

"More than forty years later I was present at the last setting of this star-that is to say, at the representation which she gave at the Theatre Français in the winter of 1854. 'Bodogune and the Malade Imaginaire' formed the programme of that solemnity. The house was crowded; even the orchestra had been taken possession of by the public. When the three knocks had sounded, the curtain rose amid a profound silence. It is impossible to assist at a solemn representation at the Comédie Française, when the musicians are absent, without being impressed by the rustling of that curtain which rises slowly and majestically to reveal one of those palaces of painted canvas once inhabited by those sovereigns who bore the names of Le Kain and Talma.

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

public her magnificent eyes, then clouded with the immense sadness of a goddess who is about to die. She cast around her, above her, and afar, that veiled and mournful glance. She seemed to be contemplating the vanished years, and to be astonished at finding herself, after so much glory that was no more, still lingering so late in the vacant temple.

"Then I heard around me the same exclamation that I had heard more than forty years before, 'How beautiful she is!'

"The whole career of Mademoiselle Georges, her life, her glory, her genius, her faults, and her triumphs, lay between, and was explained | by, those two exclamations."

Laugel's recently - issued work, entitled "Grandes Figures Historiques," contains sketches of Josiah Quincy and of Charles Sumner.

The theatres are closing one by one. The Comédie Française has revived "On ne badine pas avec l'Amour," by Alfred de Musset, and the critics are going for" Croizette savagely, because in the last scene she reproduces the ghastly effects of the death-scene of the Sphinx, and that, too, when the personage she personates has merely to announce the death of a rival. LUCY H. HOOPER.

OUR LONDON LETTER. Ar the St. James's a new "musical folly " has been produced-the music being by Mr. Arthur Sullivan, the libretto by Mr. "Rowe." If I am not greatly mistaken, Mr. “Rowe" is Mr. W. S. Gilbert, than who no one can write more nonsensically (I mean this as a compliment). The plot is simple, and as unreal as need be. It shows how the Earl of Islington, disguised as a footman, makes love at the Zoological Gardens-the piece is named "The Zoo"-to a pretty bar-maid. A peculiar kind of love-making it is. His lordship drinks, eats, and flirts, with the pretty wench, and then eats, drinks, and flirts, with her again, the result being that at last he "stuff's" himself so full of buns and lollypops that he faints away. Then is his real rank discovered. On his coat being torn open, the order of the Garter is seen. However, the earl's intentions prove to be honorable, for in the end he proposes to the fair bar-maid, and she, it need hardly be said, eagerly closes with the offer. The various airs are very spirited; doubtless we shall soon have them on the street-organs. But isn't Mr. Sullivan wasting his talents in giving us such trivial work?

Miss Ellen Terry, who has so suddenly come to the very front of her profession, is paying the penalty of success. The green

eyed monster dogs her footsteps; her fellowactresses are intensely jealous of her. At a "five-o'clock tea" the other evening, at which I was present, Miss Terry's name happened to come up. "She is much overrated, I am sure," remarked one lady, a well-known tragédienne, poutingly, turning up her delicate retroussé nose. "Hard and uncultured to a degree-now, don't you think so, Mr. Blank?" Mr. Blank did not think so; but what could he do? He attempted to shuffle out of answering the question, failed miserably, and made her of the nez retroussé his enemy forever.

'Tis well to be an opera-singer-that is, of course, if you become popular. Look at the salaries some of the musical " 19 stars get! Madame Patti is just now receiving two hundred pounds for each night she sings at Covent Garden; while Capoul is having a salary of four hundred pounds a month. And, after all, Capoul is not getting so well paid as Faure

or Nicolini. They have six hundred and twenty pounds a month each.

Mr. Comyns Carr is the writer of the spicy World articles on the London press. Mr. Carr is well known as an art-critic. He has a capital paper in the Portfolio this month on the drawings of Albrecht Dürer in the British Museum-a splendid collection.

comes.

66

More new plays. The other night an adaptation of "La Dame aux Camélias " was produced at the Princess's, and since then a new and original comedy-drama," as the author, Mr. Hamilton Aide, describes it, has been brought out at the Court. The adaptation-it is entitled "Heartsease "-is by Mr. James Mortimer, the proprietor and editor of the London Figaro, who has done his work not at all badly. His is a free adaptation; he by no means sticks to his text. With him Traviata, so far from being "naughty," is a virtuous and consumptive actress, by name Constance Hawthorne. Her accepted lover is one Herbert Maitland, the son of a rich old fogy. The old gentleman, when he hears of Herbert's passion for Constance, has an interview with her, tells her that Herbert can never be hers, as their grades in life are so different, and ultimately persuades her to run away from him. The climax soon Constance gains the protection of a Captain Bloodgood, but soon after dies brokenhearted, not, however, before she meets Herbert at a ball, and is unjustly accused by him of all sorts of things. Perhaps Mr. Mortimer carries the whitewashing process a little too far; but then, you know, every thing on the English stage must be strictly correct, except the dresses, and they, notwithstanding the lord-chamberlain, are, as a rule, as short above and brief below as ever. The heroine is played, with some pathos, by Miss Barry, the biggest woman-she is both very tall and stout-on our boards, I should imagine; while the hero is inadequately personated by perhaps our heaviest-built actor, Mr. William Rignold, the brother of him who has been turning, as we are told here, the heads of so many of your belles. On the first night, by-the-way, there was an amusing scene. Mr. Mortimer is out of the good books of the "gods." In his paper, some time ago, he called them "rabble," and they have never forgiven him for it; wherefore, whenever he appears in a theatre, they hoot and hiss at him, and address to him remarks any thing but complimentary. On this first night they made an energetic attempt to "damn" his piece. Again and again were the opening scenes interrupted by them; they "chuffed " the actors and actresses, and jeeringly called for their arch-enemy, Mr. Mortimer, himself. Suddenly, while Miss Barry was standing alone upon the stage in a pathetic attitude, in rushed Mr. Rignold, his eyes flashing fire, his great fists clinched. "Stop! stop!" he yelled. "If you are Englishmen, those of you who have mothers, wives, or daughters, remember there is a lady before you! For myself," he went on, still at the top of his powerful voice, "all I ask is justice! Hiss me, howl at me, if you like, but don't abuse me before you see the picture I am about to draw." This exhortation saved the piece. Silence reigned throughout the evening. The "gods" were completely cowed. Probably if they had known, as I did, that Mr. Rignold had merely repeated a bit of "copy "-that, as the opposition was foreseen, he had learned the words by heart, in order to rush in with them on his tongue at the most fitting moment-they would only have laughed at him.

66

Mr. Aide's play (Mr. A. is a novelist and a song-writer) is far cleverer than Mr. Mortimer's; indeed, take it all in all, it is one of

« הקודםהמשך »